🔗 Share this article

Iran is willing to restart nuclear talks with Washington provided that it is approached with "dignity" and "respect", Tehran's top diplomat has announced.

Abbas Araghchi stated only diplomacy was effective, and revealed new appeals had originated from mediators to reopen talks with the American leadership. He claimed Iran possessed no undeclared nuclear sites, and Tehran could not yet authorize the global atomic watchdog to visit bombed nuclear sites for security reasons.

Walking a Challenging Route

The foreign minister is navigating a complex path since Iran aims to avoid be perceived to be acting from a position of disadvantage, and he consistently maintained that Iran had come out more resilient in military terms and emotionally from the Israeli-US attack on its enrichment centers in June.

He was speaking at a strategic meeting in Tehran where he reaffirmed that Iran had "an inalienable right to refine atomic fuel within its borders that it will always maintain" – the primary cause of the stalemate in the earlier negotiations.

Previous Discussions Suddenly Concluded

The earlier sessions of discussions between the United States and Iran were brought to an abrupt and hostile conclusion on 12 June when Israel, with American backing, struck Iran's enrichment centers in a fortnight-long engagement that culminated with the American leader declaring the facilities had been eliminated. Subsequently, EU nations employed their privilege to reimpose UN-wide sanctions, but Iran maintains they have not had a substantial consequence.

Perfect Agreement Suggested

Iran's diplomats stated they felt they had reached a "perfect agreement" to the enrichment issue in prior discussions, when it was agreed an local partnership with US participation could process nuclear material. Each party would have been able to declare success since home-based processing would have remained and the US could be confident that Iran's nuclear programme was exclusively peaceful.

It had not been decided in the discussions that American atomic experts could function within Iranian territory, but that was a reasonable assumption of the cooperative offer. Representatives claimed three times they had secured an understanding with Trump's special envoy the American negotiator only for the agreement to collapse due to "spoilers in Washington".

Present Status

Iranian officials stated the partnership proposal was now off the table, but it seems quite possible the proposal could be resurrected in various formats if negotiations restart.

The US president in recent days said he had been receiving messages that Iran sought to restart talks, but confidentially Tehran representatives state they are not yet obtaining consistent overtures from the United States either straightforwardly or from important Middle Eastern intermediaries, such as the Qatari government, the Egyptian leadership, the Omani authorities and the Saudi kingdom. The Tehran's diplomatic corps has been accused of non-responsiveness in the face of the US president's straightforward manner, but Tehran asserts dialogue is not part of a show.

Political Position

In his address to the conference, aimed to paint the US as a hegemonic power that exploits the notion of worldwide standards, Araghchi declared the 12-day war revealed the clash could not be ended by armed force. He asserted the attacks commenced with a American requirement for an unconditional Iranian surrender and culminated with an unconditional call for a ceasefire.

Iran is certain the opening assaults from Tel Aviv were carried out with total Washington understanding and cooperation, making confidence challenging to reestablish.

Diplomacy Remains the Primary Solution

Araghchi said: "Tehran was not the one that had fled dialogue; it was America and the European states that had consistently sought to impose their will during the negotiations. Diplomacy can still be active and continues the final answer to settle disagreements, but its standards, guidelines and fundamentals must be adhered to."

"Provided that they talk to the nation of Iran with the language of dignity and honor, they will obtain a response in the identical language."

Recovery and Reconstruction

In what is characterized by Iran's diplomats as the conflict of repair and rebuilding, Araghchi stated he was certain Iran's security strengths "are considerably enhanced than prior to 13 or 14 June of this year. Every aspect of our defense have been rebuilt. We learned multiple understandings from this war; we have identified our personal limitations and the shortcomings of the enemy."

He added: "We successfully passed this engagement. Our nuclear technology, which they aimed to obliterate, continues to exist. The installations and machinery, if eliminated, will be restored; what is important is the will of the nation of Iran and then the national cohesion that they targeted, but were unable to destroy. The Iranian people have grown more powerful, more cohesive, and more supportive of the leadership and the nation in the aftermath of this attack."